the two sides were not appealed.

(Reporter Wang Qiu) Ms. Yin Tian told his wife outside their own offended people get into trouble,air max,http://www.armonicos.co.jp, in order not to bring disaster to the family,http://www.alpha-sd.co.jp/bbs/light.cgi,louboutin homme pas cher, divorce,boutique louboutin paris, Ms. Bao Yin Ping. Tien also promised,woolrich donna,http://atlantic.gssc.nihon-u.ac.jp/~committee/member/comchat1/comchat.cgi, divorce is not home,scarpe hogan, things are a two settle on remarry.

Ms. Yin did not expect that,scarpe hogan interactive,http://www.175yxw.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=36823, soon remarried after divorce Tian with other women. She sued her ex-husband angrily asked to pay a break fee. Yesterday,http://privacy.org/cgibin/mt/mt-search.cgi,abercrombie pas cher, reporters learned,chaussures louboutin hommes, Tongzhou court Tien pay 1.8 million yuan to his ex-wife, Ms. Yin.

It is reported that Ms. Yin and Tian are university students,chaussures louboutin hommes,http://www.aqp.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, have been married for 20 years and has two adult daughters. Ms. Yin said that in November 2009, her husband said that offended people on the outside, she asked not to bring disaster to apply fake divorce,hollister sale, divorce and promised not to leave home,chaussures louboutin hommes, the two settle on one thing remarry. After Ms. Yin agree, the two signed a divorce agreement,hollister france, agreed to pay Ms. Yin Tianmou 1 million yuan,http://phude-nyc.com/forums/profile.php?id=6455, the two sides to civil divorced. Ms. Yin think both sides will certainly remarry later,jordan pas cher, so did not want this one million yuan to her husband.

But in July 2011, Ms. Yin and others suddenly heard her husband remarried, she was very angry, and immediately put forward want one million yuan,christian louboutin homme, Tian agreed to pay 1.8 million yuan Ms. Yin and signed a written agreement,nike tn pas cher, but then Tian has not been paid,louboutin femme pas cher, Miss Yu Shiyan took the agreement to court to sue her ex-husband repayment.

Tian trial argued that the written agreement is signed by the ex-wife of his stress, not his real desire,louboutin homme pas cher, but he failed to provide evidence of this.

Ms. Yin said that she and her ex-husband from the university to establish a feeling,louboutin homme pas cher, she felt a deep affection for both sides, did not think her ex-husband wanted a divorce. Now her ex-husband had remarried,abercrombie france, she no longer hope their marriage,http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/read.cgi, so insist Tien paid 1.8 million yuan by agreement.

Court that Tian pay $ 1.8 million to sign the agreement,peuterey outlet, failed to provide evidence of the existence of stress situations when it signed an agreement, it was not supported for this excuse. After the first trial, the two sides were not appealed.

(Original title: deceive his wife divorced her husband dig 1.8 million break-up fee)